Work with me on retainer
Traditional engagement models create misaligned incentives and unnecessary overhead. A retainer structure solves these fundamental problems while maximizing value for both parties.
Why traditional models fall short:
Four common engagement approaches. Each creates friction, misalignment, or unnecessary overhead.
Fixed Price Projects
Scoping Overhead
Fixed-price work sounds simple, but it starts with a lot of upfront scoping. As you learn, the scope always shifts, and every change turns into a negotiation. That adds overhead and delays while everyone tracks scope instead of solving the problem. In the end, both sides spend more time managing the contract than delivering value.
Employment
Requires Consistent Workload
Hiring full-time can be steady, but it only works with a consistent, well-planned workload. It needs detailed roadmaps, regular check-ins, and ongoing management. You also absorb hidden costs - benefits, tools, and admin. This add up quickly. When work slows you pay for idle time, and when the workload spikes the team can't scale fast enough.
Hourly Consulting
Misaligned Incentives
Billing by the hour puts everyone on different sides of the table. Consultants are incentivized to increase hours, while clients are incentivized to cut them. Important but not urgent work gets pushed aside because it's hard to justify in the moment. Quality suffers when decisions revolve around time logs instead of outcomes.
Technical Co-Founder
Requires Compatibility
Bringing on a technical co-founder means giving up meaningful, permanent equity. It ties you into a close personal and professional partnership that must work under pressure. If vision, pace, or values misalign, the fallout can hurt the business. Unwinding the relationship later is legally complex and often expensive.
Enter the Retainer Model
A flexible engagement model that aligns incentives and maximizes value
How It Works
- Fixed monthly price with guaranteed minimum hours
- Fortnightly reporting of hours used and remaining
- Unused hours "bank" and carry over month-to-month
- Flexible scope - focus on delivering maximum value
Tier 1 - Bug Fixing & Maintenance
Your systems work, but things break. Small issues become urgent fires because there's no one to address them quickly.
- •Perfect for stable businesses with occasional technical needs
- •Ideal when you have existing systems that just need maintenance
- •Great starting point for businesses new to technical retainers
- •Cost-effective solution for predictable, routine technical work
Tier 2 - Feature Development
You need ongoing development plus strategic technical guidance. Your business is evolving and your systems need to evolve with it.
- •Best for growing businesses that need regular feature development
- •Ideal when you need strategic technical guidance alongside execution
- •Perfect balance of development capacity and architectural oversight
- •Great for businesses scaling their technical capabilities
Tier 3 - Technical Leadership
You need comprehensive technical leadership without the overhead of a full-time executive hire. Strategy, execution, and team guidance all in one.
- •Essential for businesses preparing for funding rounds or major growth
- •Perfect when you need C-level technical strategy and execution
- •Ideal for companies requiring board-level technical reporting
- •Best choice for comprehensive technical transformation projects
Priority Response System
Standard
Guaranteed up to 72 hour response time for non-urgent requests
Priority
Guaranteed up to 48 hour response time with dedicated development focus
Highest
Guaranteed up to 24 hour response time with highest priority
Note: All tiers include access to urgent support when critical issues arise.
Example Timeline
| Month | Tier | Available | Used | Remaining | Activity Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2024 | T1 | 30 hours | 4 hours | 26 hours | Minimal maintenance work during business downtime |
| January 2025 | T1 | 30 + 26 =56 hours | 16 hours | 40 hours | Minor feature development and bug fixes |
| February 2025 | T2 | 60 + 40 =100 hours | 100 hours | Major reporting functionality development | |
| March 2025 | T1 | 30 hours | 25 hours | 5 hours | Return to base tier for ongoing maintenance |
| April 2025 | T2 | 60 + 5 =65 hours | 65 hours | Customer growth drives feature expansion and optimization | |
| May 2025 | T3 | 120 hours | 115 hours | 5 hours | Funding round preparation: scalability improvements, technical due diligence support |
December 2024
T1Minimal maintenance work during business downtime
January 2025
T1Minor feature development and bug fixes
February 2025
T2Major reporting functionality development
March 2025
T1Return to base tier for ongoing maintenance
April 2025
T2Customer growth drives feature expansion and optimization
May 2025
T3Funding round preparation: scalability improvements, technical due diligence support
Frequently Asked Questions
Key questions about our process, pricing, and guarantees, answered with full transparency.
Ready to Explore a Better Way?
Let's discuss which retainer tier makes sense for your business needs and how we can maximize the value of our collaboration.
Schedule a Consultation